About Me 0105

Monday, August 15, 2011

Credit rating Range: Determines a Potential Borrowers

Acquiring your free credit score online will provide you having a extremely essential bit of credit score information. These scores range from anywhere among 300 and 900. The greater it's the much better prices you are able to anticipate to get on loans. Your score will assist you to make feeling of your credit history, it offers a great image of how nicely you are handling your finances as well as offers you insight into exactly what collectors and loan companies examine when determining whether or not you are qualified for a cost card or loan.

This really is precisely why we advise that everybody obtain their totally free credit score score a minimal of 1 time for each year. When you are about to apply for a charge card, it is an excellent strategy to get a copy of one's score and report, and examine it to make certain that all the information is right. It's feasible to acquire a duplicate of your report completely free of cost each and every year from each 1 with the credit score bureaus.

While the over concept is a completely appropriate means of tracking your credit standing you could also obtain a three in one report being an option.

This kind of report provides the information that seems in your report as compiled by Equifax, Experian and TransUnion and provides you the large image of what your credit history actually appears like. Typically, a three in 1 credit history gives you a short checklist of possibly tough info, which you are able to rapidly and easily assess. It is additionally identified as being a three Bureau Credit report.

Collectors, lenders, and financial institutions will report to a credit bureau any time a consumer will get a loan, opens up a brand new credit card account, misses a payment on the month-to-month bill, or files for individual bankruptcy. Nevertheless, they're not needed to report it to all three credit score bureaus. The result is that the no cost credit report you get from one credit score bureau could possibly be lacking some essential details. That missing information can frequently have an excellent influence in your credit score status. In the event you would really like a really obvious see of how great or dreadful your credit report really is, you should appear at investing in a three in one credit report.

A detailed analysis of one's online credit score and report will provide you with a fantastic insight into your financial situation. Within the event you place in your order to get a complete credit score score from 1 with the 3 credit bureaus, you are able to be qualified to obtain your credit document from Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax within a joint file. These are heading to help you in simple evaluation of precisely where you stand and make it possible for you to notice the versions inside your 3 credit score reports. It is heading to help you follow all loans and charge cards that are opened in your title and also you also are heading to be in a place to understand which companies get in touch with the credit score bureaus.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Being Right or Making Money

From TPM Muckraker, posted before our national celebration of Freedom:

A Luxembourg-based subsidiary of Koch Industries has admitted to making illegal campaign contributions to political candidates and committees.

INVISTA is a limited liability company involved in the textile manufacturing business that is organized in Luxembourg but headquartered in Kansas. They admitted in a filing with the Federal Election Commission that was disclosed this week that they made 12 contributions totally $26,800 to various political committees between Nov. 2005 and Oct. 2009.

INVESTA voluntarily disclosed the violations to the FEC in Aug. 2010 after an investigation by Koch Companies Public Sector (KCPA), which represents Koch Industries and their affiliates, and outside counsel. Their investigation revealed that the employees involved with making the donation decisions did not know INVESTA was a foreign entity and did not know that foreign corporations could not contribute to state elections like corporations could.

For me, the news (and puzzle) is not that they did it, but that they self-reported it. Note that the action is: (a) pre-Citizens United; (b) inadvertent (because the employees of the foreign company "did not know" they were working for a foreign company); and (c) some Koch internal watchdog entity fessed up.

The fine is "$4,700 for violating the law" under an "conciliation agreement" plus an agreement get the money returned. The effect is to appear to confirm the foreign donations ban, but I'm wondering why KCPA came forward.

But something's going on that's not being reported. Why did they fess up? Businesses don't usually fess up about anything. They always make the feds prove it, even for minor stuff like perfectly clean sawdust in milk.

Yet on this story, there's nothing but silence on that aspect. For instance, here's the same tale from HuffPost (my emphasis):

INVISTA's contributions were disclosed to the FEC after lawyers for Koch Industries discovered the illegal contributions and relayed the information to the FEC for review.

All very voluntary, and no digging for causes.

If I'm managing this strategically from atop the Olympian clouds at Koch Brothers Central, I'd work the response more cleverly into my geo-political grand schemata. After all, I want all election contribution restrictions overturned, don't I. So is this minor event a bit of hyper-clever mis-direction by the Koch Olympians, or a mistake by a corporate underling working in a sub-office of a subsidiary (in this case, the Koch internal watchdog group)?

Could be either, but I suspect that this was handled too quickly and at too low a level for Olympian eyeballs, by relatively honest people who were hired to do non-geo-political wrangling — i.e., keeping the numerous acquired toilet-paper and textile companies in that giant Kochish octopus on the right side of basic and mundane law.

Pushing the Citizens United envelope is not mundane, however. So if I'm right, you may not see that kind of compliant response again. But in any case, expect a challenge to the foreign corp limitation from somewhere. After all, the Chinese would love a piece of the purchase-a-politico game, assuming they don't already have their own set of retainers under contract. It's going to happen.

But for now, kudos to Koch lower-downs for (inadvertently?) doing the right thing. Hope you have a backup plan in case the bosses aren't pleased.

GP

1: Capitalism’s now a lethal soul sickness, needs a reawakening

What’s the real problem? Not the economy, not markets, nor even politics. Yes, our economic pains are real. But they’re just symptoms. Something’s structural wrong. Since 2000 endless bad news: Greed, deceit, stupidity, corruption, unethical behavior, lack of moral conscience.

The real problem’s deep in our character, the “mutant capitalism” Jack Bogle warned of in “The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism.” Sadly, that battle was lost. With it we lost our soul, our moral compass. America’s character is measured by our net worth.

2. We’re already in the early stages of a Great Depression

Comparing today with the Great Depression is common sport. In a Newsweek special “Seeing Shades of the 1930s,” Dan Gross wrote: “Wall Street, after two terms of a business-friendly Republican president, self-immolated on a pyre of greed, incompetence and excessive optimism.” Today’s “new normal” economy means high unemployment for years, inflation driving prices, rising interest rates, more debt, chaos.

We are destroying ourselves from within. Former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker warns that “there are striking similarities between America’s current situation and that of another great power from the past: Rome.” Three reasons “worth remembering: declining moral values and political civility at home, an overconfident and overextended military in foreign lands, and fiscal irresponsibility by the central government.” We are becoming more vulnerable to external enemies.

3. Good Depression exposes our self-destruct bubble-thinking

Before the 2008 crash, “Irrational Exuberance” author Robert Shiller warned in the Atlantic magazine that “bubbles are primarily social phenomena. Until we understand and address the psychology that fuels them, they’re going to keep forming.” Housing inflated 85% in the decade: “Historically unprecedented … no rational basis for it.”

Bubble thinking is an toxic virus that infected everyone. Shiller warns of another coming: “We recently lived through two epidemics of excessive financial optimism … we are close to a third episode.”

4. Good Depression will stir outrage, force real reforms

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Jim Grant, editor of the Interest Rate Observer, wrote: “Why No Outrage? Through history, outrageous financial behavior has been met with outrage. But today Wall Street’s damaging recklessness has been met with near-silence, from a too tolerant populace.” Grant worries that Wall Street will run “itself and the rest of the American financial system right over a cliff.”

But we only went to the edge in 2008. Today, a rebellious “throw the bums out” hostility is blowing a new kind of bubble: Three years ago we did not have Tea Party, union fights, the Arab Spring and Greek austerity riots, all signs of an dark angry future sweeping across America.

5. Good Depression forces Wall Street to think outside the box

In a powerful Bloomberg Markets feature, “No Easy Fix,” we’re told Wall Street’s “profit formula has hit a wall.” Their “money-making machine is broken and efforts to repair it after the biggest losses in history are likely to undermine profits.”

Even Mad Money’s Jim Cramer openly admits hedge fund managers are pocketing megaprofits at capital gains rates while laughing at the stupidity of a broken political system that gives hundreds of billions in tax breaks to the richest, then takes taxes off the table as our middle class is dying under massive unsustainable deficits. Soon angry mobs will “fix” Wall Street.

6. Good Depression will deflate America’s warring soul

The American economy is a “war economy” driven by a egomaniac. I saw it firsthand as a U.S. Marine. Americans love being king of the hill, world’s cop, the global superpower. Why else spend 54% of our tax dollars on a war machine, 47% of the world’s total military budgets.

Why? Our war machine generates such “spectacular profits that many people around the world” are convinced America’s “rich and powerful must be deliberately causing catastrophes so that they can exploit them,” warns Klein in “Shock Doctrine.” No wonder the GOP takes military spending, like tax cuts for the rich, off-the-table: The war industry is a major political donor.

7. Good Depression now … avoids a far bigger depression later

In “The Price of Liberty: Paying for America’s Wars,” Robert Hormats, undersecretary of state and a former Goldman Sachs vice chairman, traces America’s wartime financing from the Revolutionary War to present wars. He warns that today we’re “relying on faith over experience, hoping that sustained growth will erase deficits and that the ballooning costs of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will be manageable in the coming decades without difficult reforms.”

Absent a brutal reset, we are on a historically predictable course says Kevin Phillips, Nixon strategist and author of “Wealth & Democracy:” “Most great nations, at the peak of their economic power, become arrogant and wage great world wars at great cost, wasting vast resources, taking on huge debt, and ultimately burning themselves out.” Yes, burned out, unprepared.

So pray for a Good Depression earlier rather than later. Choose now and we can be prepared for whatever comes. Or a Great Depression will hit later, when we’re least prepared, the problems bigger, our faith weaker … don’t raise the debt ceiling.

And the take home message:

reputation management process
08/03/2011: U.S. Department of Justice, EPA to Hold News ...
3, 2011) - Representatives of the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will hold a news conference at 1:30 p.m. tomorrow, Thursday, Aug. 4, in St. Louis, Mo., to discuss a significant ...
08/03/2011: U.S. Department of Justice, EPA to Hold News ...
News In Brief: Life - Science News
Flowery advertising, tempting toilets for shrews, bat beacons and more in this week's news.
News In Brief: Life - Science News
Great news: Service industry now slowing down, too « Hot Air
Great news: Service industry now slowing down, too.
Great news: Service industry now slowing down, too « Hot Air

Monday, August 1, 2011

foreclosure agents

The latest report by Shahien Nasirpour at Huffington Post confirms two things you’ve heard here and on some other sites following this sorry affair: first, that Tom MIller, Iowa attorney general who is leading the 50 state attorneys general negotiations on mortgage abuses, is a liar, and second, that any settlement will be a whitewash.

Actually, we already knew Miller was a liar. Shortly after the effort was launched, Miller promised that “”We will put people in jail.” He then started walking that back. Not only did he tell Bloomberg that they were NOT pursuing criminal charges, but per an e-mail:

I was w/ a European documentary maker this weekend who spoke to Miller a few days ago and said Miller relayed the fraud isn’t so bad, everything will be worked out .. the standard line; he’s already made up his mind. He doesn’t want those European governments demanding their money back. The meeting is a photo-op setup because the too-big-to-fail crowd is scared of put-back liability and shorts; they’re working hard to make it appear they’re doing something to quiet everybody down.

Note this message was sent BEFORE MIller made the “jail the baddies” promise that MIller recanted. And it indicates that this entire affair was intended to be an exercise in kabuki theater rather than anything remotely resembling a real investigation.

That brings us to MIller’s second lie. After a staffer ‘fessed up that no investigations were being undertaken, Miller maintained that extensive examinations were underway. That, as Nasiripour indicates, confirming earlier intelligence via Gretchen Morgenson, is complete crap (emphasis ours):

According to sources familiar with the ongoing state and federal probes, state and federal officials have wasted months not digging into the details of the foreclosure crisis, yielding little of value in court and undercutting the lenders’ incentive to strike a settlement of greater benefit to homeowners and taxpayers.

The investigators have yet to gather many documents, conduct depositions or assemble tallies of aggrieved homeowners. They don’t yet have a good handle on the number of wrongful foreclosures, the amount of fraudulent documents filed in local courts or the volume of legal instruments processed by so-called “robo-signers,” the agents that lenders employed to process foreclosure filings en masse without examining the underlying paperwork.

“The evidence a prosecutor would use is not in the possession of the prosecution,” said one person familiar with the ongoing settlement talks.

Even Richard Shelby, the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, and a long-standing critic of Wall Street, is not happy with the lack of investigations:

We need a full-fledged investigation,…There’s no substitute for a thorough investigation and finding of fact

The piece later details the evidence the prosecutors say they have obtained, and shows how it actually adds up to very little. This was a feature, not a bug. Consistent with the objective of doing nothing more than provide air cover for the banks, no meaningful investigations were conducted (and on top of that, there have been plenty of other irregularities in how the discussions were conducted). We pointed out this was essential to have any negotiating leverage: a party agrees to settle in order to escape possible litigation. The HufPo article underscores that point:

“I would never want to go into a negotiation without solid evidence of actual misconduct to hold as leverage over my counterpart,” said Neil M. Barofsky, the former special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which was crafted to bail out teetering banks. “It would also be very dangerous from a public policy perspective to waive all future claims as part of such a settlement if you do not have a good sense of the size, scope and severity of the underlying misconduct.”

If you don’t have a credible threat to launch a suit, why should anybody bother? The answer here is obvious: this isn’t a “settlement”; it’s a cash for a broad release (effectively, an indemnification). And since the AGs have done nada in the way of a probe, only the banks know the value of that waiver, and they won’t enter into a deal unless they think it is a bargain.

And indeed, the intended deal is a “get out of liability for almost free” card:

….expedience now appears to be trumping other considerations in settlement talks with major mortgage servicers. Despite failing to marshal a strong case proving misconduct during the foreclosure crisis, the government is seeking to craft a settlement quickly, in the hopes that this will inject greater certainty into the financial system, stabilize home prices and add vigor to a flagging economy.

Ah, yes, if we just give the banks another bailout, surely that will fix the economy! We can see how well that movie is working. As if “fixing the economy” is a good reason to ignore crooked behavior. By that logic, the government shouldn’t go after companies that sell beef full of e-coli because they provide employment.

And have no doubt, the Administration’s fingerprints are all over any deal:

The Justice Department is pressing state attorneys general to release the banks from liability for a host of alleged violations in exchange for a far-reaching settlement, people familiar with internal discussions said.

And the AGs have been sold a complete bill of goods:

The government fears that if it can’t stanch the flood of foreclosures by lowering troubled homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments — and if mortgage servicers cannot resume taking possession of homes for which borrowers have long been delinquent and sell them to people able to afford them — the housing crisis could drag on for years, keeping the broader economy in a feeble state. This is the scenario the government is seeking to stave off by striking a swift settlement with banks, restoring legal clarity to the foreclosure process and providing additional relief for distressed borrowers.

By including assistance for homeowners in the settlement agreement — like loan modifications that reduce payments or the overall amount owed — state and federal authorities said they believe they can help the housing market recover.

This is utter rubbish. First, the AGs are NOT going to “restore clarity to the foreclosure process.” Any action by the AGs will have no impact on the judiciary (the settlement will apparently include useless boilerplate about how banks will follow the law. They are supposed to be following the law regardless; an extra affirmation is pointless). The reason the banks are having so many trouble foreclosing is pervasive problems with how ownership interests were handled in the securitization process. In most cases, they are not amenable to easy fixes, which is why there has been so much fraud committed in courts all over the country.

The story indicates that the states are willing to sell out because any cash settlement would help fill yawning state budget gaps. But what we have been told by well placed sources is that the banks will take a deal only if it is very close to free: a minimal cash component (the $30 billion number in the HuffPo article is pure smoke and mirrors), with the rest being credits of various sorts, including for past mortgage mods. Oh, and any settlement is tax deductible, further lowering what little real cost there will be.

To the extent the AGs believe they need to bribe the banks to do mods, they’ve been snookered. The Fed and the OCC had the power to make them happen, now. The biggest banks all have large second lien portfolios (almost entirely HELOCs). They’ve refused to modify first mortgages because it’s a lot of work they don’t get paid for, and they make good money foreclosing. And they are able to keep borrower looking current on seconds via a combination of bullying and accepting very skinnied down payments.

If the Fed and the OCC told banks that they had to write down the second liens on delinquent mortgages, and write off the second liens on homes where they started foreclosing on the first, you’d see a 180 degree change in behavior. Banks would be falling all over themselves to do mods Indeed, if these regulators were to take this step (which is within their power) you’d probably see an bank change of heart on bankruptcy cramdowns too (banks twice beat back legislation to write down the value of a mortgage to the market value of the house in bankruptcy proceedings, which is done with very other type of secured consumer debt).

If you are as upset with this as I am, call your state attorney general and give him a piece of your mind. You can find their phone numbers here.

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

23 Responses to “Will the AGs Turn the US into a Banktocracy?”

joeyfishface Says:

July 11th, 2011 at 10:02 pm

“Its a sad situation, and it appears that whatever hopes we may have had that the Attorneys General were not like the whores in Congress appear to be starting to fade. (At least NY and California AGs are showing some spine).”

Perhaps the AGs, Feds, Regulators, etc. knew damn well what they would find and can’t risk the fallout of possibly collapsing the market? Given that the Fed has little firepower left, maybe they figure it’s a necessary (albeit ugly) evil?

Or not.

uzer Says:

July 11th, 2011 at 10:10 pm

joeyff, do your powers of rationalization help you sleep?

champs2011 Says:

July 11th, 2011 at 10:54 pm

US 200 year chart history

http://gmbpost.com/investment-news/chart-sheer-marvel-200-year-history-of-us-growth/

Mike in Nola Says:

July 11th, 2011 at 11:09 pm

Why do you phrase the question as if we are not already a banktocracy?

Mark E Hoffer Says:

July 11th, 2011 at 11:24 pm

“Why do you phrase the question as if we are not already a banktocracy?”

Mike in H-town,

Good Q: !

Andy T Says:

July 11th, 2011 at 11:36 pm

“At least NY and California AGs are showing some spine.”

Not really. NY and CA just need the cash more … you just need to put out a little bit of work to strong arm the banks into paying you some money.

Bob is still unemployed Says:

July 11th, 2011 at 11:48 pm

From the quoted article:

Despite failing to marshal a strong case proving misconduct during the foreclosure crisis, the government is seeking to craft a settlement quickly, in the hopes that this will inject greater certainty into the financial system, stabilize home prices and add vigor to a flagging economy.

In my most humble opinion, if you want to inject greater certainty into the financial system, then you appropriately punish those who are responsible for crashing said financial system.

If you let those who have crashed the system off lightly (as this settlement appears to do), then you are sending the signal that the financial system will never be robust and reliable because crooks can easy scam the system and get way with little more than a wrist slap.

Those who swear to protect the financial system need to send the message, “do not mess with the financial system.

This proposed settlement sends the opposite message.

dsawy Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 12:13 am

Why would you think that the AG’s weren’t political whores like those in Congress?

Where do you think AG’s go when they get tired of being AG’s?

Links 7/12/11 « naked capitalism Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 5:32 am

[...] Will the AGs Turn the US into a Banktocracy? Barry Ritholtz (hat tip reader John M) [...]

wisedup Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 5:54 am

hey, wiseup you guys.

You think that anyone with any amount of capital is going to piss off the people who can make or break his future?

The AG’s are somewhat smarter than those who invested in Uncle Bernie, but not by much. They need the reassurance that what money they have can be magically enlarged – without risk if they are good little boys.

barbacoa666 Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 6:52 am

Our current ZIRP is a subsidy to banks. Unless I am mistaken, the SS and Medicare Trust Funds will earn lower rates of return due to ZIRP. So, in order for these trust funds to remain solvent, current and future American retirees must either pay higher taxes, see reductions in their SS checks, or retire later. So, in essence, the working people of America are being charged a back-door tax that is being used to float our zombie banks.

rktbrkr Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 7:10 am

(unemployed Bob)… This proposed settlement sends the opposite message.

Ditto Paulson’s pulpitizing about about “moral hazard” and then the Treasury and Fed proceed to punish predent savers to rescue and reward reckless risk takers.

I’m sure the states AGs are being pressured to be “team players”. CA and NY will be able to squeeze a lot out of them, CA was ground zero for bad behavior. I’m surprised FL,AZ,NV aren’t playing hardball too – grassroots politics overruling big banks lobbyists.

Anthony Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 7:18 am

more importantly, Europe is in meltdown mode.

Italian bonds moved 42bps in a day. That is an enormous move. That also means an enormous drop in the price of Italian bonds (in the range of 3%). Banks holding Italian bonds just saw the value of their assets go down a lot. Who thinks European banks are in such good shape that they can withstand declines in asset values? From an accounting perspective if the assets are categorized as ‘held to maturity’ a bank wouldn’t have to recognize the decline in value but that doesn’t change the reality that the value of their assets dropped.

This quickly become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Market participants know this so they stop transacting with each other. There’s an article in the WSJ about that very point (European banks are pulling back their exposure to each other).

This could get ugly fast.

HEHEHE Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 7:32 am

Government sanctioned fraud is all it was so now lets sweep it all under the carpet.

I have a tiny amount of sympathy for BAC and JPM simply because we don’t know the entire story re their taking over Countrywide and IndyMac – the institutions were the fraud was widespread. Were they really arm lengths deals that were willingly entered into or were the acquisitions forced down their throats ala Merrill and BAC by the Fed and Treasury? Btw what ever happened to Ken Lewis? He’s kind of disappeared ever since he accused Bernanke and Paulson of threatening him.

DC Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 8:03 am

[But Harris announced last week that the special unit will likely lose its investigative abilities, a consequence of a debilitating $71 million budget cut. Her office will lose the ability to follow up on open investigations ranging from foreclosure scams to "multi-million dollar corporate fraud," she said in a statement.

"It's all about their budgets," Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) said last week about the state attorneys general and their settlement talks with the banks while rubbing his thumb against his fingers.

...

"We need a full-fledged investigation," said Alabama Republican Sen. Richard Shelby, the ranking member on the committee. "There's no substitute for a thorough investigation and finding of fact."]

—

Classic Republicanism from Coburn and Shelby. Just as with the SEC, FCC, FEC, etc., the goal is to starve the enforcers at the federal level and push that responsibility to the states. States of course are out of money and don’t stand a chance of making up the difference.

But these stalwarts of stupidity demand action! Investigation! What a reeking load of bullshit from self-righteous, corporation-owned senators-for-life who long since forgot what it’s like to be an “average American.”

Small Business Depression, Lack of Faith in Federal Government | Raw Finance Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 9:14 am

[...] what some sharp observers, like Barry Ritholtz, are terming a “Banktocracy” (see “Will The AGs Turn The US Into A Banktocracy?” at The Big Picture [...]

lambert Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 9:50 am

Can we avoid the “politicians are whores” trope? It’s insulting to whores. Thank you!

Julia Chestnut Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 10:06 am

Government of the corps, by the corps, for the corps. Now playing at a kabuki theater near you.

DeDude Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 10:08 am

@DC;

You are absolutely right. It is all about not having the resources to do the fight, because the GOPsters behind the door have slashed the budget. It is such an easy scam to get passed the idiots of this idiocracy. Why doesn’t/didn’t the gobinment do X !!! ??? – because you idiots voted for corporate sock puppets who cut the budget such that the gobinment does not have the resources to do X. When things go wrong the GOPsters can always come back and claim we don’t need to change anything because it was all the fault of gobinment (not enforcing current laws). Look at the joke of outrage about illegal immigrants. They had a law banning companies from hiring illegals, and then they had 100 people total in the only agency charged with enforcing that law – how could that go wrong.

Lugnut Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 10:53 am

let me translate the AG position: “We can’t be arsed to actually conduct a proper investigation on something so massive, so how about you guys just give us a whole bunch of money, since we need it; no one goes to jail, and we call it even? Sound like a plan?” Ptui.

I would just loooove to see any one of these so called news networks chasing down some of these AGs down the steps of their office buildings, stick a mic and a camera in there face ala Madoff, and ask why they’re offering payoffs in exchange for criminal prosecutions. Everyone points the fingers at the banks, but if the government offers no checks and balances for criminal behavior, or worse yet, leans towards what amounts to federal bribery for malfeance, whos really the worse actor in this play? The banks? I say the regulators and justice officials, as well as the Congressman who sell out for kleptocratic legislation bear equal top billing.

AHodge Says:

July 12th, 2011 at 10:54 am

a useful deal is possible

which would include punishment for foreclosure fee adding and lying

writing off second mortgages and

serious cramdowns and capital writedowns for banks and big pressure to short sale

but allowing cases where the house is vacant to go forward on inadequate docs

if the AGs want to do penalties and fines that are applied to writedowns and loan forgiveness?

i cant object, though its something the banks should do anyway

however if the AGs get little but a pot of tens of billions of penalties to farm out how they like?

they will be whores that a russian oligarch or chinese party official would have nothin to top

Bracton Says:

July 16th, 2011 at 5:32 pm

@AHodge:

money recovered by a state AG in a situation such as this goes to the state treasury, usually the general fund or a dedicated consumer protection fund. no state legislator or governor would let the state AG hand out the money himself.

@DeDude, @DC:

you hit the nail on the head in terms of resources available to a state AG. any enforcement action or civil litigation started against the banks, etc. would be hugely complicated, time-consuming, and expensive for a state AG’s office. california and new york can take the lead in a case like this because the respective AG offices are large, and there are attorneys in those offices with experience in financial regulation.

Senka Says:

July 26th, 2011 at 11:17 pm

Prosecuting Wall Street investment banks and their “geniuses” is not only a matter of democracy, but more importantly, it is about survival of America that we all love…and the only path for our kids’ future.

How did we become just one big hypnotized mass, even after the truth has been revealed? We’re walking around as if we’re mesmerized, not standing up, not demanding justice, still paying our mortgages to lenders who don’t even legally own them…

MA citizens stood up together on July 18th, demanding answers and justice- http://tinyurl.com/3qsu87x

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Newsbeat, Chartbeat's news-focused analytics tool, places its bets ...

Late last week, Chartbeat released a new product: Newsbeat, a tool that takes the real-time analytics it already offers and tailors them even more directly to the needs of news orgs. Newsbeat essentially breaks down the news site into ...

Newsbeat, Chartbeat's news-focused analytics tool, places its bets ...

Morning News | Slog

Posted by news intern Peter Johnson. Debt Ceiling: the Senate will vote on a new plan at 1 PM today. Talks are ongoing; Senate Majority...

Morning News | Slog

News In Brief: Molecules/Matter & Energy - Science News

Clear batteries, mucus busters, a 3-D invisibility cloak and more in this week's news.

News In Brief: Molecules/Matter & Energy - Science News

Friday, July 29, 2011

Making Money

TMZ has learned ... Rachel Uchitel has given Tiger Woods back most of the settlement money he paid her ... and now Rachel is preparing to sue Gloria Allred, the lawyer who struck the deal, allegedly because Gloria sold her out for money.

As TMZ reported, Gloria negotiated a $10 million settlement for Rachel ... just hours before Rachel was going to hold a tell-all news conference about Tiger Woods. The settlement included a confidentiality agreement, which prohibited Rachel from talking about Tiger.

We've learned the agreement stated ... if Rachel violated the confidentiality clause ... she would not only have to return the money she received but Tiger could sue her for damages as well.

Sources tell TMZ ... several months ago Tiger's lawyer, Jay Lavely, contacted Gloria and said they were going after Rachel because they believed she violated the confidentiality agreement by allegedly speaking with TMZ and going on "Celebrity Rehab" to treat her "addiction to love" -- though she never talked specifically about Tiger on the show.

We're told Rachel felt strongly she had not violated the agreement, but Gloria allegedly convinced her she would lose if push came to shove, so Gloria struck a deal with Lavely -- that Rachel would return the lion's share of the settlement money.

But our sources say ... what has Rachel fuming is that Gloria allegedly made a deal with Jay Lavely -- that Gloria would still get all of her attorney's fees. Rachel believes Gloria sold her out ... allegedly making a deal with Tiger's lawyer to strong-arm Rachel into giving the money back and in return Gloria would get her fee -- a fee Gloria would not have received if Rachel went to arbitration and lost.

We're told Rachel went along with the deal, but as time went on she felt she had gotten screwed, and then hired a malpractice lawyer who has made a demand on Gloria to either pay Rachel what she gave back or get sued.

Sources tell TMZ ... Rachel's lawyer has given Gloria a deadline, and if Gloria doesn't ante up ... a legal malpractice lawsuit will be filed.

We contacted Gloria, who said, "No comment." Ditto Rachel, who was also mum.

UPDATE: TMZ asked Gloria if her law partner, Nate Goldberg, was the lawyer who negotiated Rachel's big give-back to Tiger. This time she said she couldn't answer because of "attorney-client privilege."

UPDATE: Gloria just told TMZ, "Our law firm no longer represents Ms. Uchitel and we have no comment on this story at this time. However, we are confident that we have always acted appropriately and in her best interests."

UPDATE: Gloria just gave TMZ another statement: "I was not involved in any way in the allegations set forth in the TMZ story which appears today and which references me. I have not had a conversation with or communicated with Jay Lavely about any client in more than a year. I am reserving all of my legal rights and remedies against anyone who defames me."

Friday, July 22, 2011

Payday Mortgage Myths - Know The truth About Payday Loans

Have you attempted applying for a faxless payday loanat a bank and had no collateral, property or good credit? If you stated sure you probably remember the sting of rejection that arrived from not getting the type of lending contract which you required. Borrowing an quantity of money, of any dimension, is tougher now than it was just two years ago and for people who need extra cash to spend for sudden expenses, health-related expenses or individual requirements obtaining a Payday Mortgage is the best choice.

How to Apply For Payday Loans

If you want to apply for a United kingdom Payday Loan or payday lending anyplace else within the globe you'll be asked to current the next products. one. Proof of earnings - At least 6 months of consistent employment. two. Proof of age - You need to be 18 years old or older. 3. Evidence of bank account - This is required simply because you need to create a check to become offered the mortgage.

The average payday agreement charges a substantial APR (Yearly Percentage Rate) that can assortment from .00 to .00 based on how much money you borrow. The APR that payday lending businesses charge has gotten lots of flak recently and also the damaging suggestions isn't usually according to honesty. The high APR that payday lending businesses cost is high because the phrase with the loan is brief (generally 2-4 weeks). The APR is also higher than on other lending contracts due to the comfort of the brief term mortgage.

How to Conserve Money On Payday Loans

You can save money on instant payday loansby choosing a local Payday Mortgage Loan company over an on-line lender. But in the event you live inside a state exactly where borrowing against your paycheck is outlawed you've to choose an online company. When you have your Payday Cash Loan approved, set priority to spend the mortgage off inside thirty days because the longer you drag out the contract, the more cash you will spend in finance charges towards the loan company.

How you can Find Track record Info On Anybody

Finding the right individuals to function for you has in no way been an straightforward career. Everybody is excellent at something but you have to figure out if they're most most likely to be fantastic at performing what you need them to complete. Not merely that, you need to also make particular that they're heading to match in together with your organization and existing staff. That is why having great employment track record procedures is essential whenever you are employing new workers.

I'm certain your quest for background check totally free on-line has arrive to an end as you study this publish. Sure, gone are these days once we have to research endlessly for background totally free on-line info or other this kind of information like background totally free on-line,criminal background track record ,national criminal track record checks and even potential worker background Even with out articles for example this, utilizing the Internet all you've got to do is log on and use any of the search engines like google to discover the background check totally free on-line information you need.

Use the forums-don't be frightened to join in on discussion board discussions with other website members. Inquire concerns, share guidance and construct your professional network com.Be an excellent listener-demonstrate a real curiosity in what the interviewer has to say. Try to not interrupt by interjecting a comment whilst a person else is speaking (even when you are afraid you may forget the stage you'd like to produce).

The best method to keep employees at your production plant.How you are able to keep employees at your manufacturing plant When it comes to employing workers you will find numerous suggestions and tricks which you can follow to ideally utilize the most effective employees which you can locate.

When you possess the patience to go by means with the remainder of this write-up related to track record check free on-line you'll unquestionably comprehend one or two points that will prove truly useful to you. Preserve correct on reading and be properly informed about check free online also as other related track record totally free online,criminal background background , nationwide criminal checks or potential worker background examine info.

In case you're looking for a trustworthy company, you should bear in mind that these services will come at a price. Usually, nevertheless, the fee is nominal. You will find websites that declare to provide a totally free support, but usually these are extremely best avoided.

Dealing using the Colorado Springs criminal law just is not an ordinary factor and is as a result very best left to trained attorneys. The experienced Colorado criminal defen.If an employee has suffered an injury at his workplace then he has the proper to declare for compensation. The insurance coverage businesses nonetheless make an effort to stall the identical.

It might curiosity you to understand that plenty of folks searching for background check free online also got information concerning other track record examine totally free on-line,criminal background track record checks, national criminal checks, also as possible employee track record check right here easily.

What can go wrong will go wrong, in the worst moment. They may be as a result of human mistakes or oversight, incomplete or out-dated particulars, mistaken identity or identification theft and so forth. Whatever the situation is, we wouldn't be oblivious towards the hurt or victimization and could be well-prepared to face as much as issues if needed. And when we do flip up some factor unfavorable but correct in the self-check, we get a chance to repair it ahead.

More About Automobile Insurance Types

As modern customers, people have turn out to be educated to comparison price often for solutions individuals pay money for. Monetary services for instance mortgages, insurance coverage, also banking are a few of probably the most competitively priced solutions that battle for company. One of these, automobile insurance coverage is most likely probably the most aggressive. You will find many companies that sell automobile insurance to get a wide assortment of prices and actually is essential which you have an knowing of the differences among the companies and why you will discover this kind of a wide assortment of prices.

Businesses that consist of instant auto insurance can be frequently categorized into two classes: on-line and complete service. You will find a number of basic dissimilarity amongst both of those company types that has a great influence on prices and support.

On-line insurance is extremely popular for individuals who are definitely computer skilled and comfy with doing company on-line. This demographic is expanding, but happens to be younger and busier and views the ability to search online and quote, obtain and print insurance coverage documents by on their own without worrying about the benefit for talking with an insurance coverage agent as being a comfort and not as being a danger. Those that are structured to focus on this demographic are actually established to be the price leader simply because they truly don't possess the accessible funds invested in a major facilities and in an agent force and may offer a price reduction but nonetheless keep on being productive.

Full support businesses are created under a different company viewpoint. They promote their policies via a network of area agents who maintain an real office. They have acquired advertising methods and methods which core around being in a position to grant customized one on 1 service. Furthermore, complete instant car insurance service companies will typically manage to package deal offer policies plus provide package offer reduced costs for purchasers who've home and existence policies which is in particular cases are more aggressive compared to promoting cost the web primarily based policies provide for the car on your own.

An additional thing to consider when you compare web based businesses to actual support businesses will be the service when handling statements. Typically, the web primarily based policies will not have the ability to handle a declare as rapidly or resourcefully as the complete agency will probably be in a position to.

The online policies will usually use a third celebration agreement insurance coverage adjuster who generally has a big backlog of statements to appear more than. But, full service policy which will have accessibility to many in-house statements adjusters who will go and consider treatment with the claim immediately.

About Me 0105

Monday, August 15, 2011

Credit rating Range: Determines a Potential Borrowers

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Being Right or Making Money

08/03/2011: U.S. Department of Justice, EPA to Hold <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> In Brief: Life - Science <b>News</b>

Great <b>news</b>: Service industry now slowing down, too « Hot Air